Tuesday, January 8, 2008

Seductive Angel

Last Thread Next Thread
Author
Thread




gent_jack
Newbie
Registered: 05-12-2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 20

Review: Seductive Angel
Date: 12/27/07
Provider: Seductive Angel
Phone or Pager: 210-629-6072
Email Address: NA
URL / Website: NA
City: SA
State: Texas
Area / Address: NW, generally near I-10/Wurzbach
Appointment Type: Incall
Provider Category: Independent
Activities: LT, LK, BBBJ, HJ, DATY, MPCFS
Session Length Scheduled: 1
Fee: $$
Total Paid: $$
Was Tipping or Upselling an issue? No
Was the Description you were given accurate? Yes
Hair Color and Length: Brown w/highlights; shoulder length
Age: 2?
Race: Hispanic
Perfume/Fragrance: Light Fragrance or Perfume
Smoking Status: Could Not Tell Either Way
Where did you hear about this provider? Provider Ad

Provider`s Body: Cute face, tight spinner body with a great backside. Small breasts, not flat, but well shaped A-cups. A couple of non-distracting tats. She said she used to be a private dancer (bachelor parties, etc). I think she's been described as 5'4" -- that may be a little generous, not that it mattered.
What was the Provider's Attitude like? Friendly, but a bit detached


Comments: Someone reviewed Angel saying she has one of the best faces in SA, and while darn cute, I have to disagree -- she has your typical Saturday afternoon young lady shopping in Ingram Park Mall face, nothing that will knock your socks off.

She was very easy to schedule with, maybe because I called early, around 11am, and scheduled for a 2pm session. The incall is a hotel, and I don't know about you, but that is a slight turnoff, especially during the day. No music, and the sound of the housekeeping cart rattling outside the door was a little offing. She wasn't much of a converstionalist either, pretty down to business. Once we got down to the activities, it was easier to ignore all of this. Speaking of which...

Angel is BBBJ, despite some earlier claims that she was CBJ, maybe YMMV. She takes her time in this regard, with slow, wet motions, and good attention paid to not only the head, but the shaft and the orbs at the base of the statue. It was very, very good, not the best, but close.

Turned around for a little DATY. Now I pride myself in this regard, but either I was off of my game or she is very quiet with her responses.

We started the CFS in CG; she said up front this wasn't her favorite position, which bummed me out a little (who doesn't like to have a little spinner dancing excitedly on top of them?) Alas, it was at least good to do a lot of hand exploration, and just the feel of how soft AND firm she was at the same time got me more excited. So we decided to move to doggie (her fave), and she seemed to enjoy this more, but again, either she's just quiet naturally, or I suck at sex. So instead of focusing on making sure she was satisfied first, I just went for how it felt good for me. She is a good size inside, you can feel her with every part of you, and that ass, OMG, it is a handful, and a great cushion -- just don't slap it, she told me up front that she doesn't like that, and I don't do that anyway, so no big deal.

Feeling the end was near, I wanted to try some variations on mish, then finished off with a oiled-up HJ.

Overall, the activities were VERY good, would have been great had I thought her mind was into it as much as her body. Maybe for some that isn't a problem, and maybe YMMV -- she seems very sweet, I just may not have been her type.

I am checking yes for the recommendation, and I was satisfied with the session. It's just easier for me to describe the mood (which in this case was so-so), than the actual leg/arm angles, tongue techniques, etc. And since I don't have BCD, I am out of touch on how in-depth other writers get. I hope this helps you guys out.

Would you recommend this Provider to others? Yes

No comments: